‘Serious ex-facie vitiating factors’ about trial’s process led to Rahul’s conviction in defamation case: Singhvi in HC

Senior lawyer Abhishek Manu Singhvi argued on behalf of Rahul Gandhi in gujarat high court declining a stay to his conviction in a criminal defamation case over his “Modi surname” remark. | file photo

Senior lawyer Abhishek Manu Singhvi on Saturday told the Gujarat High Court that “very serious ex-facie vitiating factors” about the trial’s process led to the conviction of Congress leader Rahul Gandhi in a criminal defamation case over his “Modi surname” remark.

Mr. Singhvi is arguing on behalf of Mr. Gandhi in the high court, which began hearing the former Congress president’s plea challenging the order of the Surat sessions court declining a stay to his conviction in a criminal defamation case over his “Modi surname” remark.

Justice Hemant Prachchhak of the High Court took up the criminal revision application filed by Mr. Gandhi challenging the April 20 order of the sessions court.

If the High Court allows his plea, it could pave the way for Mr. Gandhi’s reinstatement as a Member of Parliament.

On Wednesday, High Court judge Justice Gita Gopi recused herself from hearing the case after it was brought before her for an urgent hearing. The matter was then assigned to the court of Justice Prachchhak.

Arguing in the high court, Mr. Singhvi said, “There are very serious ex-facie vitiating factors of the trial that raise grave apprehension about the process of trial which led to the conviction. In the case of a public servant or a legislator, it has very serious additional irreversible consequences – to the person, the constituency, and also drastic consequences of re-election,” he told the court.

Also read: Defamation perils: on the Rahul Gandhi case

A metropolitan magistrate’s court in Surat on March 23 sentenced the former Congress president to two years in jail after convicting him under Indian Penal Code (IPC) sections 499 and 500 (criminal defamation) in a 2019 case filed by Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) Gujarat MLA Purnesh Modi.

Following the verdict, Mr. Gandhi, elected to the Lok Sabha from Wayanad in Kerala in 2019, was disqualified as an MP under the provisions of the Representation of the People Act.

Mr. Gandhi, 52, challenged the order in the Surat sessions court along with an application seeking a stay to the conviction. While granting him bail, the court on April 20 refused to stay the conviction.

Purnesh Modi filed a criminal defamation case against Mr. Gandhi over his ‘How come all thieves have Modi as the common surname?’ remark made during an election rally at Kolar in Karnataka on April 13, 2019.


  • Adam Gray

    Adam Gray is an experienced journalist with a passion for breaking news and delivering it to the masses. With over a decade of experience in the field, he has covered everything from local stories to national events, earning a reputation for his accuracy, reliability, and attention to detail. As a reporter, Adam is always on the lookout for the next big story, and his dedication to uncovering the truth has earned him the respect of his peers and readers alike. When he's not chasing down leads, Adam can be found poring over the latest headlines, always on the lookout for the next big scoop. Contact [email protected]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *